Home News Local news Balance Needed Between Oppenheimer Beach Use and Neighbors' Concerns

Balance Needed Between Oppenheimer Beach Use and Neighbors' Concerns

5
Balance Needed Between Oppenheimer Beach Use and Neighbors' Concerns

A balance must be found between the community’s need for recreation facilities and neighbors’ concerns about noise and crowd sizes at Oppenheimer Beach, according to several testifiers at a Committee on Culture, Historic Preservation, Youth and Recreation hearing at the St. John Legislature Building in Cruz Bay Thursday night, which drew about 70 people.

"There are challenges,” said St. Claire Williams, commissioner of Sports, Parks and Recreation, “but we need to balance the need of the community and the use of the facility in a manner to not cause harm or damage to the facility.”

"Oppenheimer is unique with its deed restrictions governing how the facility can be used and managed," Williams said.

While Oppenheimer Beach is owned by the Virgin Islands government and overseen by the Department of Sports, Parks and Recreation, covenants on the land prohibit any businesses on the property, restrict the use of amplified music, call for the gate to be closed to vehicles at all times and more, Williams explained.

The beach and concrete structure on the land is the site of Sports, Parks and Recreations’ summer camp, numerous nonprofit fundraising events – as well as weddings and birthday parties – and should be coveted by the community, Williams added.

"This is a beautiful piece of property and all of us have a reason to ensure it is maintained," said Williams. "We should be proud of it."

But with so much of St. John, and most of the island’s beaches, restricted in use under the authority of the National Park, there is a lack of adequate community recreational sites, according to Phillip "Grasshopper" Pickering, one of the residents who testified before the committee regarding public use of Oppenheimer Beach.

"The closing of numerous venues has made Oppenheimer the only place we have left," Pickering said.

"Where on St. John can a for-profit group have gatherings?” he asked. “We used to have Pond Mouth and they took that away. We used to have Hawksnest Beach and they took that away. We used to have Maho Bay and that is gone – even Frank Powell Park."

"Oppenheimer was the last hope to have a fun-filled musical experience," said Pickering, a member of the reggae band Inner Visions.

Located between Hawksnest Bay and Peace Hill, the white sand shoreline of Oppenheimer Beach was deeded to the people of the Virgin Islands in 1980 by the daughter of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb. When Oppenheimer bought the property from the Gibney family in the 1960s, the deed included several covenants protecting the area, explained testifier Eleanor Gibney, who lives down the beach from the Oppenheimer facility.

"The deed included reasonable restrictions including prohibition of businesses, allowing only a single family structure and having first right of refusal if the property was offered for sale," said Eleanor Gibney, whose parents sold the property.

The land was transferred to the V.I. government in February 1980 and has been operated under the authority of the Department of Sports, Parks and Recreation since. Hurricane Hugo destroyed the original structure on the property with a new building constructed following the storm.

Trouble began when that building began to be frequently rented out and often for inappropriate uses, Gibney explained.

"There would be heavily amplified music, frequent fights and gunfire in the surrounding streets with police summoned to the area repeatedly," she said. "There were many activities that were inappropriate and even a ‘Girls Gone Wild’ show filmed there. For the Gibney family, the deed restrictions had come to the forefront."

The Gibney family is asking for fair and consistent rules for the facility, Eleanor Gibney added.

"Our concern with the music is the volume of the music, not the type of music," she said. "We are asking for fair, consistent and respectful rules."

Use of Oppenheimer Beach is now restricted to nonprofit groups and individuals between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. with no amplified music allowed.

Pickering said that, despite those covenants in place, if people want to have live music at Oppenheimer Beach, they should be allowed. "I understand there are some clauses in there, but this is what the people want," he said.

"The people should be the ones who decide what happens there. I don’t want to hear what one woman wanted when she deeded the land and I don’t want to hear what one woman wants now."

Emmanuel "Mano" Boyd, who also testified at the hearing, said the community needs a space like Oppenheimer Beach to host live concerts.

"St. John needs such a place because the Park has so many restrictions," said Boyd. "We St. Johnians feel pushed back. This was willed to the people and should used by the people – with reasonable restrictions, sure. The music can be turned down and the area needs to be kept clean."

While the size and noise level of events should be monitored and regulated, Oppenheimer Beach should continue to be a community gathering space, Boyd added.

"It should be used for birthdays and weddings," he said. "Oppenheimer Beach should always be used by St. Johnians."

The biggest issues at Oppenheimer Beach are the noise levels and the crowd sizes, explained Teri Gibney, who lives next door to the facility and operates a small business renting two cottages on her property.

"The most serious problems are the loudness of the music and when there are huge numbers of people with no respect for my property," Gibney said. "Having alcohol and loud music and 400 people there disrespecting the whole area, that’s hard to live with."

With such a beautiful place protected for use by the Virgin Islands people, there should be a way for everyone to enjoy Oppenheimer Beach, according to the Commissioner of Sports, Parks and Recreation.

"We must find a way to be accommodating for the best interest of everyone," said Williams.

The Gibney family also thinks the area can be enjoyed by the community while respecting the neighbors.

"I wish for some kind of rules and regulations that work for everyone," said Teri Gibney. "I hope that we can work together to get something that works for everyone. I really want this to work for everyone on St. John."

Williams pledged to meet with Pickering, other concerned residents and the Gibney family at Oppenheimer Beach to reach an agreement on how the facility should be used.

Pickering also offered several suggestions to decrease sound travel in the area, including building a platform facing the water and erecting a wall along the property line.

Sen. Myron Jackson, chairman of the Committee on Culture, Historic Preservation, Youth and Recreation, said that while public use of Oppenheimer Beach should be operated with clear and consistent regulations, St. John needs more recreational facilities.

"What is clear is the lack of planning for the needs of our communities in terms of parks and recreation," said Jackson. "This should not be the only facility on St. John for this purpose."

Sen. Tregenza Roach was the only other committee member present at Thursday night’s hearing. Committee members Sens. Shawn-Michael Malone, Nereida "Nellie" Rivera-O’Reilly, Janette Millin Young, Terrence "Positive" Nelson and Kenneth Gittens were absent.

Sen. Craig Barshinger, although not a member of the committee, was also present.

5 COMMENTS

  1. The deed restrictions plainly state what is allowed and what is not. The beach property was deeded to the VI Gov. with those restictions in place and they accepted it as such. It should continue to be honored.

    When there is “heavily amplified music, frequent fights and gunfire in the surrounding streets with police summoned to the area repeatedly,” as well as having many activities that are inappropriate and even a ‘Girls Gone Wild’ show filmed there,” those restrictions are NOT being honored and those living nearby and their businesses must suffer just so people can party in an intrusive, abusive and dangerous manner? “Having alcohol and loud music and 400 people there disrespecting the whole area,” should not be allowed.

    Honor the deed restrictions in place at Oppenheimer Beach and have the “FOR PROFIT” Organizantions find other sites for their venues.

  2. To Pickerings statement(s):
    I would love to see her (GIbney) take the whole thing away.
    THERE. DONE.
    ‘ONE WOMANS’ right as THE OWNER.
    if you cant go by the RULES, you cant play. It has been shown, “The People” cant be trusted with these things. Loud, obnoxious, unlawful, rude, insensitive, disrespectful….., shall I continue???

  3. Submitted by grasshopper on May 30, 2014 – 3:25pm.

    Greetings Diggster, If my words hurt or seem a bit harsh that was surely my intent. It sure got everyone involved attention fairly quickly and got the ball rolling so everyone can enjoy the area. The Gibney family have always had a good rep with St. John and it’s original people. Eleanor was my classmate for a short time at Julious Sprauve School and her father was my teacher too!. John and Ed was two of the locals who we knew we could depend on in times of need. Yes! I can play by the rules very well. However the statement above was taken from my written testimony at a time when I was requesting for this hearing. Somehow, you don’t seem to be someone who has been here over 20 plus years or you would understand our frustration. All public locations for the people to recreate are all now physically gone. For someone who was raised here and seen the changes it creates unwanted tension. So imagine me trying to secure the area for a fundraiser and told I can not use it because “Terri Gibney” was objecting and that they had found a clause which prevented us playing there. Naturally I was upset. We had been playing there since the early seventies!!! You must know however, that no where in any deed is there and restrictions against amplified music. I think that was explained quite clearly last night. So in that respect, I am playing by the rules! The only other issue that needs to be solved is the question of vending at the beach. Can any fundraising activity happen there, and is that considered vending or conducting a business? This is what needs to be clarified. Other than this, I for one am willing and ready to seek solutions (and I’ve already suggested a few) that would help curb most of the volume that disturbs the villas over by Terri and the surrounding neighborhood. I refuse to get into a slug match over this with you as it is obvious to me that the Gibney family, the Government and we the people of St. John are more than willing to get together to make this work for everyone. So no need to jump on me. We got this, thank you.

  4. exislandmanvi

    One of the residents admitted she is not following the covenants of the development when she stated she has a “business’ renting out two cottages.

    However the band that wants to hold for profit events need to PAY for a place to hold those events, get a permit to hold the event and post a bond to insure the area is cleaned afterwards.

  5. The resident who stated she has 2 cottages she rents out does not have them on the Oppenheimer property but at an adjacent property which is separate from the deed retricted beach property. Pretty sure her guests would like peace and quiet while staying in her cottages just as any other visitor to our islands would expect while staying at a villa, guest house, etc. One would imagine that such loud and distruptive parties have an financial impact on her ability to conduct her business by renting the cottages.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here